Sauce Labs Customer Idea Portal
Submit an idea and make Sauce Labs even better!
Submit an idea and make Sauce Labs even better!
Submit an idea and make Sauce Labs even better!
Currently, we have multiple domains that we specify in our tunnel instances with either the --tunnel-domains flag or --direct-domains flag. We would like to the ability to use these two flags in conjunction with one another(Currently this is not possible) so that given two conflicting -d or -t parameters, the more specific domain name should win.
Guest
Notes from the phone call WRT KP - tunnel-domains:
if URLs match the patterns - they use tunnel
there is on firewall on DMZ everything needs to be whitelisted - that is done by network team
it woulb great if the --tunnel-domains allowed for exclusion list on the regular expression matching
Attachments Open full size
Hello!
Technically, you can use both parameters. If the same domain is in both, then --tunnel-domains overrides. However, we found that it's not working as expected and have an open bug for this. It seems that everything is going through the tunnel.
Regarding wanting the exact match to beat the wildcard, that is something that we would have to add, but it makes a lot of sense and I've heard this request before. I've created a ticket in our backlog for this, but I do not have an ETA at this time.
Best,
Jean
Attachments Open full size
I can actually relax this to state:
Given two conflicting --tunnel-domains or --direct-domains, an exact match beats a wildcard match.
Attachments Open full size